Kraft v. Hanover & McSherrystown Water Co.
This text of 88 A. 909 (Kraft v. Hanover & McSherrystown Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action of trespass to recover damages caused by the pumping of water from a stream that furnished power for the plaintiff’s mill. The assignments of error mainly relate to the sufficiency of the evidence to show the extent of the diminution of the volume of water and [120]*120á causal connection between tbe act of the defendant and the injury complained of. All questions raised by the appeal are satisfactorily disposed of in the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas, on which we affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 A. 909, 242 Pa. 114, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraft-v-hanover-mcsherrystown-water-co-pa-1913.