Krafick v. Krafick

648 A.2d 164, 231 Conn. 920, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 361
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 20, 1994·No. SC 15043·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 930 (AC 12717), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[921]*921Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15043. David S. Maclay, in support of the petition. Daniel P. Weiner, in opposition.
“1. In a dissolution action, is a vested defined benefit pension a part of the property that must be equitably distributed?
“2. If the first issue is answered yes, what is the proper method for valuing the pension?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krafick v. Krafick, 648 A.2d 164, 231 Conn. 920, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 361 (Colo. 1994).

648 A.2d 164 (Krafick v. Krafick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krafick v. Krafick
663 A.2d 365 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)