Krafick v. Krafick

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Krafick v. Krafick

648 A.2d 164, 231 Conn. 920, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 361

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 20, 1994

DocketSC 15043

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 648 A.2d 164 (Krafick v. Krafick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krafick v. Krafick, 648 A.2d 164, 231 Conn. 920, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 361 (Colo. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 930 (AC 12717), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[921]*921Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15043. David S. Maclay, in support of the petition. Daniel P. Weiner, in opposition.

“1. In a dissolution action, is a vested defined benefit pension a part of the property that must be equitably distributed?

“2. If the first issue is answered yes, what is the proper method for valuing the pension?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 930 (AC 12717), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[921]*921Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15043. David S. Maclay, in support of the petition. Daniel P. Weiner, in opposition.

“1. In a dissolution action, is a vested defined benefit pension a part of the property that must be equitably distributed?

“2. If the first issue is answered yes, what is the proper method for valuing the pension?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

648 A.2d 164, 231 Conn. 920, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krafick-v-krafick-conn-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack