Krafick v. Krafick
648 A.2d 164, 231 Conn. 920, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 361
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 930 (AC 12717), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. In a dissolution action, is a vested defined benefit pension a part of the property that must be equitably distributed?
“2. If the first issue is answered yes, what is the proper method for valuing the pension?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krafick v. Krafick, 648 A.2d 164, 231 Conn. 920, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 361 (Colo. 1994).
648 A.2d 164 (Krafick v. Krafick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Krafick v. Krafick
663 A.2d 365 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)