Kraff v. Plaza
This text of 255 A.D.2d 890 (Kraff v. Plaza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Murad, J.). We add only that defendant has appealed from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and not from the subsequent judgment in which the order was subsumed (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988). In the exercise of our discretion, we treat the appeal as taken from the subsequent judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]; Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Murad, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D.2d 890, 680 N.Y.S.2d 180, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraff-v-plaza-nyappdiv-1998.