Kraff v. Garfield
This text of 201 So. 2d 96 (Kraff v. Garfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By this appeal, we are called upon to test the sufficiency of an amended complaint filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the appellee-defendant. The amended complaint set forth alleged gross negligence under Fla.Stat. § 320.59, F.S.A., on the part of the defendant while operating a motor vehicle, causing an accident and injuries to the appellant.
We find that the amended complaint states a cause of action. Therefore, we reverse the final order here under review, dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice, upon the authority of Faircloth v. Hill, Fla.1956, 85 So.2d 870; Farrey v. Bettendorf, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 889; Carraway v. Revell, Fla.1959, 116 So.2d 16.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 So. 2d 96, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraff-v-garfield-fladistctapp-1967.