Kraemer v. Tharp

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Kraemer v. Tharp

5 Teiss. 241, 1908 La. App. LEXIS 62

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 8, 1908

DocketNo. 4504

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Teiss. 241 (Kraemer v. Tharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kraemer v. Tharp, 5 Teiss. 241, 1908 La. App. LEXIS 62 (La. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

ESTOPINAL, J.

The parties to this suit having entered into a written stipulation, agreeing that the judgment rendered herein in the District Court in favor of the plaintiff be amended by allowing to the defendant a credit of fifty-six dollars ($56.00):

It-is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be amended by reducing the amount thereof from the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars ($350) to the sum of two hundred and ninety three dollars and fifty cents ($293.50), and as thus amended it is affirmed, plaintiff to pay costs of appeal, defendant those of the lower Court. Amended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ESTOPINAL, J.

The parties to this suit having entered into a written stipulation, agreeing that the judgment rendered herein in the District Court in favor of the plaintiff be amended by allowing to the defendant a credit of fifty-six dollars ($56.00):

It-is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be amended by reducing the amount thereof from the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars ($350) to the sum of two hundred and ninety three dollars and fifty cents ($293.50), and as thus amended it is affirmed, plaintiff to pay costs of appeal, defendant those of the lower Court. Amended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Teiss. 241, 1908 La. App. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraemer-v-tharp-lactapp-1908.