Kraemer v. Revalk

California Supreme Court

Kraemer v. Revalk

8 Cal. 74, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 294

DecidedJuly 1, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cal. 74 (Kraemer v. Revalk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kraemer v. Revalk, 8 Cal. 74, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 294 (Cal. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.

The question necessary to dispose of this case, was decided in the case of John Bevalk and others v. Kraemer and others, July 1857. The judgment in this case did not affect either Bevalk or his wife, so far as the question of homestead was concerned, and he, alone, had no right to appeal. Unless both husband and wife were before the Court, no notice should have been taken as to the question of homestead.

For this reason, the appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.

The question necessary to dispose of this case, was decided in the case of John Bevalk and others v. Kraemer and others, July 1857. The judgment in this case did not affect either Bevalk or his wife, so far as the question of homestead was concerned, and he, alone, had no right to appeal. Unless both husband and wife were before the Court, no notice should have been taken as to the question of homestead.

For this reason, the appeal must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cal. 74, 1857 Cal. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraemer-v-revalk-cal-1857.