Kraemer v. Deustermann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kraemer v. Deustermann

42 N.W. 297, 40 Minn. 469, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 138

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 13, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 42 N.W. 297 (Kraemer v. Deustermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kraemer v. Deustermann, 42 N.W. 297, 40 Minn. 469, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 138 (Mich. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Gileillan, C. J.

This case appears to have been tried in a very scrambling way, but there is no reason to think the result was not what it ought to have been. The jury manifestly decided the case on the theory that, at the time defendant conveyed to plaintiff the 80-aere tract, the parties settled the differences between them in respect to the subject of the action and the counterclaims set up in the answer. The defendant testified to it positively, and he is not contradicted on the point, by plaintiff in such a manner as to seriously impair the effect of his testimony. It would have been difficult to sustain a finding against the settlement, and there was nothing to impeach it. None of the assignments of error, even if otherwise well founded, relate to anything that could in any way affect the case, so far as the settlement was concerned, and it is unnecessary to consider them.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gileillan, C. J.

This case appears to have been tried in a very scrambling way, but there is no reason to think the result was not what it ought to have been. The jury manifestly decided the case on the theory that, at the time defendant conveyed to plaintiff the 80-aere tract, the parties settled the differences between them in respect to the subject of the action and the counterclaims set up in the answer. The defendant testified to it positively, and he is not contradicted on the point, by plaintiff in such a manner as to seriously impair the effect of his testimony. It would have been difficult to sustain a finding against the settlement, and there was nothing to impeach it. None of the assignments of error, even if otherwise well founded, relate to anything that could in any way affect the case, so far as the settlement was concerned, and it is unnecessary to consider them.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 N.W. 297, 40 Minn. 469, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraemer-v-deustermann-minn-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack