Kraemer v. City of Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kraemer v. City of Newark

181 A. 148, 115 N.J.L. 519, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 337

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 1935·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

We affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, except that we find it unnecessary to determine whether the appellant was an officer of the city of Newark and therefore make no suggestion as to the fact thereon.

*520 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

We affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, except that we find it unnecessary to determine whether the appellant was an officer of the city of Newark and therefore make no suggestion as to the fact thereon.

*520 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Kraemer v. City of Newark, 181 A. 148, 115 N.J.L. 519, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 337 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

181 A. 148 (Kraemer v. City of Newark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.