Kracker v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Kracker v. City of New York

278 N.E.2d 652, 29 N.Y.2d 884, 328 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1606

DecidedJanuary 5, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 278 N.E.2d 652 (Kracker v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kracker v. City of New York, 278 N.E.2d 652, 29 N.Y.2d 884, 328 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1606 (N.Y. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

[886]*886Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Gibson. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I agree with the dissenters below that it was error for the trial court not to permit Myrtle Motors Corporation to show that the absence of brake fluid in plaintiff’s automobile was caused by the heavy impact of that vehicle with the Easton truck.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

[886]*886Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Gibson. Judge Jasen dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I agree with the dissenters below that it was error for the trial court not to permit Myrtle Motors Corporation to show that the absence of brake fluid in plaintiff’s automobile was caused by the heavy impact of that vehicle with the Easton truck.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 N.E.2d 652, 29 N.Y.2d 884, 328 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kracker-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1972.