Kracht v. Brosman

82 N.Y.S. 1104

This text of 82 N.Y.S. 1104 (Kracht v. Brosman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kracht v. Brosman, 82 N.Y.S. 1104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the referee was justified in finding that the evidence in this case did not satisfactorily establish the appellant’s claim, within the well-settled rule relative to claims against the estates of deceased persons. O’Neill v. Barry, 20 App. Div. 121, 46 N. Y. Supp. 752; Van Slooten v. Wheeler, 140 N. Y. 624, 35 N. E. 583.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Slooten v. . Wheeler
35 N.E. 583 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
O'Neill v. Barry
20 A.D. 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Van Slooten v. Wheeler
140 N.Y. 624 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 N.Y.S. 1104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kracht-v-brosman-nyappdiv-1903.