Kracht v. Brosman
82 N.Y.S. 1104
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the referee was justified in finding that the evidence in this case did not satisfactorily establish the appellant’s claim, within the well-settled rule relative to claims against the estates of deceased persons. O’Neill v. Barry, 20 App. Div. 121, 46 N. Y. Supp. 752; Van Slooten v. Wheeler, 140 N. Y. 624, 35 N. E. 583.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kracht v. Brosman, 82 N.Y.S. 1104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
82 N.Y.S. 1104 (Kracht v. Brosman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Slooten v. . Wheeler
35 N.E. 583 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
O'Neill v. Barry
20 A.D. 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Van Slooten v. Wheeler
140 N.Y. 624 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)