Kraatz v. Workman

202 Ill. App. 95
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 15, 1916
DocketGen. No. 21,410
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 Ill. App. 95 (Kraatz v. Workman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kraatz v. Workman, 202 Ill. App. 95 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.

- 3. Forcible entry and detainer, § 60*—when description of premises not materially defective. In an action of forcible entry and detainer, a description of the premises sought to be recovered as “a strip of land belonging to the east 40 acres taken off the east side of the north fraction of the northwest quarter of section nineteen (19),” held not materially defective where it appeared that all parties to the action knew exactly what property was intended to be designated. 4. Forcible entry and detainer, § 108*—what objection cannot be raised for first time on appeal. Objection that description of premises is defective cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worley v. Ehret
343 N.E.2d 237 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 Ill. App. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kraatz-v-workman-illappct-1916.