Kra v. Freeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kra v. Freeman

55 A.D.2d 928, 391 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10184

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 928 (Kra v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kra v. Freeman, 55 A.D.2d 928, 391 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In two actions between former law partners, inter alia, for an accounting, which actions were consolidated by an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 26, 1976, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the said order as (1) denied his motion to vacate the note of issue and to strike the Queens County action from the Trial Calendar and (2) directed that the consolidated actions be tried in Queens County. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and it is directed that the consolidated action proceed to trial forthwith. In our opinion, Trial Term properly determined the issues before it (see Web Transmissions v Jetro Automatic Transmission, 20 AD2d 902; Van Devort v K. & H. Evaporating Co., 252 App Div 8, 9). As provided in the memorandum decision dated June 21, 1976, all pretrial proceedings are to be completed by the date which shall be fixed for the trial. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two actions between former law partners, inter alia, for an accounting, which actions were consolidated by an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 26, 1976, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the said order as (1) denied his motion to vacate the note of issue and to strike the Queens County action from the Trial Calendar and (2) directed that the consolidated actions be tried in Queens County. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and it is directed that the consolidated action proceed to trial forthwith. In our opinion, Trial Term properly determined the issues before it (see Web Transmissions v Jetro Automatic Transmission, 20 AD2d 902; Van Devort v K. & H. Evaporating Co., 252 App Div 8, 9). As provided in the memorandum decision dated June 21, 1976, all pretrial proceedings are to be completed by the date which shall be fixed for the trial. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 928, 391 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kra-v-freeman-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack