KR

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 24, 2026·No. 2:24-cv-02352·Unknown

Opinion

PAUL S. PADDA, ESQ. (NV Bar #10417) Email: psp@paulpaddalaw.com 4560 South Decatur Boulevard, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89103 Tele: (702) 366-1888 Fax: (702) 366-1940 -and- ANTONIO M. ROMANUCCI, ESQ. (Admitted PHV) Email: aromanucci@rblaw.net JOSHUA M. LEVIN, ESQ. (Admitted PHV) Email: jlevin@rblaw.net COLTON M. JOHNSON TAYLOR, ESQ. (Admitted PHV) Email: cjohnson@rblaw.net 321 North Clark Street, Suite 900 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Tele: (312) 458-1000 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA KRISTINA KERLUS, an individual; Case No. 2:24-cv-02352 Plaintiff, vs. DR. JENNIFER CORNEAL, in her AMENDED STIPULATED individual capacity; A. SANTOS, in her PROTECTIVE ORDER AND individual capacity; COUNTY OF CLARK, CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT a municipal corporation; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE As amended on pages 5, 10-11 DEPARTMENT an independent political subdivision; jointly and severally, Defendants. The parties to this action, by their respective counsel, having agreed to the following, and for good cause shown pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 26(c)(1), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS. Disclosure and discovery activity in this action may involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure may be warranted pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under law to treatment as confidential. 2. SCOPE. All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery requests, and all deposition testimony and exhibits and any other materials which may be subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively “Discovery Material”) shall be subject to this stipulated protective order concerning confidential information as set forth below. Any Party, or any Non- Party who produces documents in this litigation or gives deposition testimony, may designate documents or deposition testimony as Confidential but only after review of the material and a determination, in good faith, that the material contains “Confidential Information,” as defined below, and pursuant to the procedure set forth below. 3. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. “Confidential Information” shall mean information that falls within one or more of the following categories: (a) information prohibited from disclosure by statute or applicable legal precedent; (b) information that reveals trade secrets; (c) criminal history information, information which, if publicly disclosed, poses a substantial risk to officers’ safety, and law enforcement documents and information that are exempt from public records disclosures; (d) research, technical, commercial or financial information that the party has maintained as confidential; (e) medical or mental health information concerning any individual; (f) personal identity information; (g) income tax returns (including attached schedules and forms), W-2 forms and 1099 forms; or (h) personnel or employment records. Confidential Information does not include information that: (a) is in the public domain at the time of disclosure; (b) becomes part of the public domain through no fault of the Receiving Party; (c) the Receiving Party can show was already in its rightful and lawful possession at the time of disclosure; or (d) the Receiving Party lawfully receives from a Non-party later without restriction as to disclosure. 4. OTHER DEFINITIONS. Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, agents, and attorney(s) of record for a Party in this action (including their associates, paralegals, and support/clerical staff). Non-party: any individual, corporation, association, or natural person or entity other than a party. Protected Material: any Discovery Material containing Confidential Information that is designated by a Party or Non-party as “CONFIDENTIAL,” unless the Receiving Party challenges the confidentiality designation and (a) the Court decides such material is not entitled to protection as confidential; (b) the Designating Party fails to apply the Court for an order designating the material confidential within the time period specified below; or (c) the Designating Party withdraws its confidentiality designation in writing. Producing Party: a Party or Non-party that produces Discovery Material in this action. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party. Designating Party: a Party or Non-party that designates Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL”. The Party or Non-party designating information or items as Protected Material bears the burden of establishing good cause for the confidentiality of all such items. Challenging Party: a party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation. 5. FORM AND TIMING OF DESIGNATION. a.Documents. Protected Material shall be so designated by the Producing Party by placing or affixing the word “CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere with the legibility of the document. Documents shall be designated “Confidential” contemporaneously with the production or disclosure of the documents. A Designating Party must exercise restraint and make good faith efforts to limit CONFIDENTIAL designations to specific materials that qualify for protection under the appropriate standard. Further, a Designating Party must use good faith efforts to designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or communications that qualify – so that other portions of the materials, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. A Producing Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “Confidential.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, and, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend on each page that contains Protected Material. b.Deposition Testimony. Portions of depositions shall be designated Confidential within fourteen (14) business days after receipt of the transcript. Such designation shall be specific as to the pages and lines to be protected. A Designating Party must exercise restraint and make good faith efforts to limit “CONFIDENTIAL” designations to specific testimony or materials that qualify for protection under the appropriate standards. Inadvertent or unintentional production of Protected Material without prior designation as “Confidential” shall not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the right to designate documents as Protected Material as otherwise allowed by this Order. Further, a Party or Non- Party may assert that disclosures or discovery material produced by another Party or Non-Party constitute Protected Material by informing all Parties by following the procedures set forth herein for a Designating Party. 6. Protection of PROTECTED Material. a.General Protections. Protected Material shall not be used or disclosed by the Parties or counsel for the Parties or any other persons identified below (¶ 6(b)) for any purposes whatsoever other than preparing for and conducting litigation in the above-entitled action (including any appeal). b.Qualified Receiving

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KR, (D. Nev. 2026).

KR (KR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
FCA U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety
137 S. Ct. 38 (Supreme Court, 2016)