Kporlor v. Robinson

Fourth Circuit

Kporlor v. Robinson

104 F. App'x 359

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2004·No. No. 04-6618·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Richard Ronald Kporlor appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure to comply with the filing fee order and denying his motion construed as a motion to reconsider under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kporlor v. Robinson, No. CA-03-973 (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2004 & Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Richard Ronald Kporlor appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), for failure to comply with the filing fee order and denying his motion construed as a motion to reconsider under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kporlor v. Robinson, No. CA-03-973 (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2004 & Mar. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Kporlor v. Robinson, 104 F. App'x 359 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

104 F. App'x 359 (Kporlor v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related