K.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

K.P. v. State

869 So. 2d 1285, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5472, 2004 WL 840546

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in K.P. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4674 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 2004·No. No. 4D03-745·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, K.P., raises four issues on appeal, the first three of which we find to be without merit. On the fourth issue, the record indicates that the trial court “reserved” on the issue of restitution but that a clerical error exists on the disposition order which indicates restitution was ordered. We remand for correction of the disposition order.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR.

FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, K.P., raises four issues on appeal, the first three of which we find to be without merit. On the fourth issue, the record indicates that the trial court “reserved” on the issue of restitution but that a clerical error exists on the disposition order which indicates restitution was ordered. We remand for correction of the disposition order.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERROR.

FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

K.P. v. State, 869 So. 2d 1285, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5472, 2004 WL 840546 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

869 So. 2d 1285 (K.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.