K.P. and N.P. v. Reed

676 So. 2d 939, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 222, 1996 WL 141742
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 29, 1996·No. 2940122·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

MONROE, Judge.

A portion of this court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte N.P., 676 So.2d 928 (Ala.1996). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the judgment of the trial court denying N.P.’s motion for a new trial of the loss of consortium claim is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, YATES, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

K.P. and N.P. v. Reed, 676 So. 2d 939, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 222, 1996 WL 141742 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

676 So. 2d 939 (K.P. and N.P. v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte N.P.
676 So. 2d 928 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)