K.P. and N.P. v. Reed

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

K.P. and N.P. v. Reed

676 So. 2d 939, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 222, 1996 WL 141742

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 29, 1996

Docket2940122

StatusPublished

This text of 676 So. 2d 939 (K.P. and N.P. v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

K.P. and N.P. v. Reed, 676 So. 2d 939, 1996 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 222, 1996 WL 141742 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

MONROE, Judge.

A portion of this court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte N.P., 676 So.2d 928 (Ala.1996). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, that portion of the judgment of the trial court denying N.P.’s motion for a new trial of the loss of consortium claim is hereby reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and THIGPEN, YATES, and CRAWLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI