Kozlowski v. Grad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kozlowski v. Grad

267 A.D.2d 77, 699 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 9, 1999·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered March 1, 1999, which, upon renewal, conditionally granted plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances at bar, the motion court’s determination to restore the action to the trial calendar conditionally was a proper exercise of discretion (see, Ronsco Constr. Co. v 30 E. 85th St. Co., 219 AD2d 281, 283-284; Nicholos v Cashelard Rest., 249 AD2d 187, 189). We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered March 1, 1999, which, upon renewal, conditionally granted plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances at bar, the motion court’s determination to restore the action to the trial calendar conditionally was a proper exercise of discretion (see, Ronsco Constr. Co. v 30 E. 85th St. Co., 219 AD2d 281, 283-284; Nicholos v Cashelard Rest., 249 AD2d 187, 189). We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Kozlowski v. Grad, 267 A.D.2d 77, 699 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

267 A.D.2d 77 (Kozlowski v. Grad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related