Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kozlowski v. Grad

Kozlowski v. Grad

267 A.D.2d 77, 699 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 9, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 77 (Kozlowski v. Grad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kozlowski v. Grad, 267 A.D.2d 77, 699 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered March 1, 1999, which, upon renewal, conditionally granted plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances at bar, the motion court’s determination to restore the action to the trial calendar conditionally was a proper exercise of discretion (see, Ronsco Constr. Co. v 30 E. 85th St. Co., 219 AD2d 281, 283-284; Nicholos v Cashelard Rest., 249 AD2d 187, 189). We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ronsco Construction Co. v. 30 East 85th Street Co.
219 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Nicholos v. Cashelard Restaurant, Inc.
249 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D.2d 77, 699 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kozlowski-v-grad-nyappdiv-1999.