Kozlowski v. Chrysler Corp.

228 N.W.2d 781, 394 Mich. 101
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 1975·No. 56091·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Entered May 8, 1975. — Reporter.

On order of the Court, the application by plaintiff-appellant for leave to appeal is considered, and the same is granted. Our review of the controlling opinion of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board discloses that it does not employ the correct legal standard for measuring loss of industrial use of both legs. This Court, sua sponte, pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), remands to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board for reconsideration of whether plaintiff has suffered the permanent and total loss of industrial use of both legs in light of Burke v Ontonagon County Road Commission, 391 Mich 103, 114; 214 NW2d 797 (1974). We retain no further jurisdiction.

Swainson and J. W. Fitzgerald, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kozlowski v. Chrysler Corp., 228 N.W.2d 781, 394 Mich. 101 (Mich. 1975).

228 N.W.2d 781 (Kozlowski v. Chrysler Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.
267 N.W.2d 923 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1978)
Kozlowski v. Chrysler Corp.
254 N.W.2d 917 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1977)