Kozlovsky v. Keroil, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kozlovsky v. Keroil, Inc.

56 A.D.2d 592, 391 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10657

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 592 (Kozlovsky v. Keroil, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kozlovsky v. Keroil, Inc., 56 A.D.2d 592, 391 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff Thomas Kozlovsky appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 10, 1975, which is in his favor and against defendants in the amount of $15,000, upon a jury verdict. (The action was transferred for trial from Kings County to New York County and the appeal was transferred to this court by an order of the Appellate Division, First Department, dated March 1, 1976.) Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The evident resolution by the jury of the conflict in the medical testimony as to whether appellant had suffered a herniated disc is not against the weight of the evidence. The verdict is thus not so inadequate as to be shocking to the conscience. Latham, Acting P:J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff Thomas Kozlovsky appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 10, 1975, which is in his favor and against defendants in the amount of $15,000, upon a jury verdict. (The action was transferred for trial from Kings County to New York County and the appeal was transferred to this court by an order of the Appellate Division, First Department, dated March 1, 1976.) Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The evident resolution by the jury of the conflict in the medical testimony as to whether appellant had suffered a herniated disc is not against the weight of the evidence. The verdict is thus not so inadequate as to be shocking to the conscience. Latham, Acting P:J., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 592, 391 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kozlovsky-v-keroil-inc-nyappdiv-1977.