Koziol v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Koziol v. State

996 N.E.2d 906, 21 N.Y.3d 1056, 974 N.Y.S.2d 26, 2013 NY Slip Op 84599, 2013 WL 4791934, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2455

DecidedSeptember 10, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 996 N.E.2d 906 (Koziol v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koziol v. State, 996 N.E.2d 906, 21 N.Y.3d 1056, 974 N.Y.S.2d 26, 2013 NY Slip Op 84599, 2013 WL 4791934, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2455 (N.Y. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as dismissed the complaint, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying appellant’s application for a preliminary injunction, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as dismissed the complaint, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as denied appellant’s motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying appellant’s application for a preliminary injunction, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

996 N.E.2d 906, 21 N.Y.3d 1056, 974 N.Y.S.2d 26, 2013 NY Slip Op 84599, 2013 WL 4791934, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 2455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koziol-v-state-ny-2013.