Koziol v. Longo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koziol v. Longo

222 A.D.2d 1126, 636 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14328

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D.2d 1126 (Koziol v. Longo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koziol v. Longo, 222 A.D.2d 1126, 636 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14328 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record supports Supreme Court’s determination after a hearing that petitioner failed to prove that any irregularities occurred in the recanvass of votes for the election in which he was a candidate. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Election Law.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record supports Supreme Court’s determination after a hearing that petitioner failed to prove that any irregularities occurred in the recanvass of votes for the election in which he was a candidate. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Election Law.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 1126, 636 N.Y.S.2d 676, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koziol-v-longo-nyappdiv-1995.