Kozik v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Kozik v. State

561 S.W.3d 900

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2018·No. ED 106295·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justin Kozik ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justin Kozik ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Kozik v. State, 561 S.W.3d 900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

561 S.W.3d 900 (Kozik v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.