Kozich v. American Safety Casualty Insurance

920 So. 2d 679, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 115, 2006 WL 51146
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 11, 2006·No. No. 4D04-4177·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the dismissal of his complaint against a bonding company. In his complaint he contended that his salary and benefits owed by his former employer, which was the insured under a payment bond, were covered by the provisions of the bond. We disagree, as the bond did not apply to his former employer’s salaried administrators under either definition of “claimant” in the bond. We also affirm as to the remaining issues.

STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kozich v. American Safety Casualty Insurance, 920 So. 2d 679, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 115, 2006 WL 51146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

920 So. 2d 679 (Kozich v. American Safety Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.