Kozesnik v. Township of Montgomery

151 A.2d 537, 29 N.J. 584, 1959 N.J. LEXIS 243
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 1, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 151 A.2d 537 (Kozesnik v. Township of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kozesnik v. Township of Montgomery, 151 A.2d 537, 29 N.J. 584, 1959 N.J. LEXIS 243 (N.J. 1959).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Cueiam.

In Kozesnik v. Montgomery Tp., 24 N. J. 154 (1957), an amendment to the zoning ordinance was declared invalid because of specific infirmities therein described. The township thereafter adopted another amendment free of those infirmities, and that amendment is the subject of the present litigation. The trial court sustained the ordinance. Before us plaintiffs assert the township officials failed to explore and to give sufficient consideration to the legislative issues involved. We agree with the trial court that there is no substance to the attack.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weikteaub, and Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Eeancts, Peoctoe and Schettino—6.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 A.2d 537, 29 N.J. 584, 1959 N.J. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kozesnik-v-township-of-montgomery-nj-1959.