Kozesnik v. Township of Montgomery
This text of 151 A.2d 537 (Kozesnik v. Township of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
In Kozesnik v. Montgomery Tp., 24 N. J. 154 (1957), an amendment to the zoning ordinance was declared invalid because of specific infirmities therein described. The township thereafter adopted another amendment free of those infirmities, and that amendment is the subject of the present litigation. The trial court sustained the ordinance. Before us plaintiffs assert the township officials failed to explore and to give sufficient consideration to the legislative issues involved. We agree with the trial court that there is no substance to the attack.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weikteaub, and Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Eeancts, Peoctoe and Schettino—6.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 A.2d 537, 29 N.J. 584, 1959 N.J. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kozesnik-v-township-of-montgomery-nj-1959.