Koyo Seiko Co. v. United States
Opinion
JUDGMENT
On June 12, 1996, this Court, in Koyo Seiko Co. v. United States, 20 CIT 720, Slip Op. 96-94 (1996), remanded the final [1078]*1078results entitled Tapered Roller Bearings, and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (“Final Results”), 57 Fed. Reg. 4,960 (Feb. 11, 1992), to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“Commerce”). In accordance with the March 20, 1996, decision and mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 95-1294, 95-1303, the Court ordered Commerce to recalculate the dumping margins for tapered roller bearings (“TRBs”) produced by Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., and distributed by its subsidiary, Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. (collectively “Koyo”) without imposing the ten percent cap to each of the five criteria used to match U.S. TRBs with home market TRBs.
Commerce complied with the Court’s directive in Koyo Seiko by removing the ten percent cap from the sum-of-the-deviations model-match computer programming language and recalculated Koyo’s 1989-90 antidumping duty margin. Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A. v. United States, Slip Op. 96-94 (June 12, 1996), Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Redetermination on Remand”) (filed August 12, 1996). The dumping margin for Koyo for the period October 1, 1989 — September 30, 1990, without imposition of the ten percent cap, is 30.08%. Id.
Accordingly, the Court affirms Commerce’s Redetermination on Remand in its entirety. This case is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1077 (Koyo Seiko Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.