Koy v. State

697 So. 2d 936, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8597, 1997 WL 423091
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 1997·No. No. 95-04877·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, but strike that portion of condition 8 of the probation order which requires appellant to pay for testing. See Curry v. State, 682 So.2d 1091 (Fla.1996); Diaz v. State, 691 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

BLUE, J., and RYDER, HERBOTH S., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koy v. State, 697 So. 2d 936, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8597, 1997 WL 423091 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 936 (Koy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curry v. State
682 So. 2d 1091 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Diaz v. State
691 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)