Koy v. Clough

New York Supreme Court

Koy v. Clough

2 Cai. Cas. 381

DecidedFebruary 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 381 (Koy v. Clough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koy v. Clough, 2 Cai. Cas. 381 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The inability of the defendant’s attorney to attend the execution of the writ, and the defendant himfelf having no notice of the day, are reafons for fetting afide the inquifition, efpecially as the damages are rather excefiive. But as the defendant’s default is, in fome degree a confeffion of the plaintiff’s right, the rule can be only on the defendant’s confenting that the judgment on the inquifition fliall be entered as of this term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The inability of the defendant’s attorney to attend the execution of the writ, and the defendant himfelf having no notice of the day, are reafons for fetting afide the inquifition, efpecially as the damages are rather excefiive. But as the defendant’s default is, in fome degree a confeffion of the plaintiff’s right, the rule can be only on the defendant’s confenting that the judgment on the inquifition fliall be entered as of this term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cai. Cas. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koy-v-clough-nysupct-1805.