Kowalsky v. County of Suffolk

139 A.D.3d 902, 30 N.Y.S.3d 568
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kowalsky v. County of Suffolk. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 A.D.3d 903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 2016·No. 2014-05862·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Garguilo, J.), dated May 27, 2014, which denied their motion to preclude the plaintiff from presenting any evidence at trial regarding surgery to his lumbar spine.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241 [1976]); the issues raised on the appeal from the order have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment entered November 19, 2014 (see Kowalsky v County of Suffolk, 139 AD3d 903 [2016] [decided herewith]).

Hall, J.P., Roman, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kowalsky v. County of Suffolk, 139 A.D.3d 902, 30 N.Y.S.3d 568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

139 A.D.3d 902 (Kowalsky v. County of Suffolk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kowalsky v. County of Suffolk
139 A.D.3d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)