Kowalski v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kowalski v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors

57 A.D.2d 858, 394 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12076

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 858 (Kowalski v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kowalski v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 57 A.D.2d 858, 394 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 5, 1977, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated August 7, 1975, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory act on the ground of age for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the State Division of Human Rights was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The determination that no probable cause existed is supported by the evidence in the record. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 5, 1977, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated August 7, 1975, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory act on the ground of age for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the State Division of Human Rights was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The determination that no probable cause existed is supported by the evidence in the record. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 858, 394 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowalski-v-nassau-county-board-of-supervisors-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack