Kowalski v. Hines

114 A. 927, 96 N.J.L. 293, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 185
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 20, 1921·Published

Opinion

Fee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliscli in the Mupreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cujee Justice, Hwayze, Trench aed, Parker, Minturn. Kaxzhnbacti, HeppenniiTirer, Wirliams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For ¡eveisal—"White, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kowalski v. Hines, 114 A. 927, 96 N.J.L. 293, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 185 (N.J. 1921).

114 A. 927 (Kowalski v. Hines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.