Kowalski v. Hines

114 A. 927, 96 N.J.L. 293, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 185
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 20, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 114 A. 927 (Kowalski v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kowalski v. Hines, 114 A. 927, 96 N.J.L. 293, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 185 (N.J. 1921).

Opinion

Fee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliscli in the Mupreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cujee Justice, Hwayze, Trench aed, Parker, Minturn. Kaxzhnbacti, HeppenniiTirer, Wirliams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For ¡eveisal—"White, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A. 927, 96 N.J.L. 293, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowalski-v-hines-nj-1921.