Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kowalski v. Gredzicki

Kowalski v. Gredzicki

197 A.D.2d 872, 604 N.Y.S.2d 871
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 872 (Kowalski v. Gredzicki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kowalski v. Gredzicki, 197 A.D.2d 872, 604 N.Y.S.2d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint. CPLR 3025 (b) provides that "[a] party may amend his pleading * * * at any time by leave of court * * * Leave shall be freely given” (emphasis added). In view of defendants’ failure to show actual prejudice resulting from the proposed amendments, plaintiffs’ motion should have been granted (see, Loomis v Corrino Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, 23-24; Brewster v Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., 185 AD2d 653). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J.—Amended Complaint.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.
429 N.E.2d 90 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Brewster v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
185 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 872, 604 N.Y.S.2d 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowalski-v-gredzicki-nyappdiv-1993.