Kowalow v. Buczkowski

248 A.D. 847, 290 N.Y.S. 370, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7599
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 248 A.D. 847 (Kowalow v. Buczkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kowalow v. Buczkowski, 248 A.D. 847, 290 N.Y.S. 370, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7599 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The instrument signed by the defendant’s testator in which he acknowledged the receipt from the plaintiff’s intestate of $2,279.23 for safe-keeping sufficiently established a 'prima facie case of a'deposit of money, not to be repaid at a fixed time but only upon a special demand within the meaning of section 15 of the Civil Practice Act. The proof of claim filed with the defendant was a sufficient demand. The cause of action arose and the Statute of Limitations began to run with the service of such proof of claim. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to recover money deposited for safe-keeping.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Hayden
175 Misc. 506 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)
Claim of Weil v. Estate of Rothschild
251 A.D. 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 847, 290 N.Y.S. 370, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowalow-v-buczkowski-nyappdiv-1936.