Kowalczyk v. Krum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kowalczyk v. Krum

15 A.D.2d 471, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.2d 471 (Kowalczyk v. Krum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kowalczyk v. Krum, 15 A.D.2d 471, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on respondent’s attorney and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before February 6, 1962, with notice of argument for the March 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on respondent’s attorney and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before February 6, 1962, with notice of argument for the March 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects the motion is denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.2d 471, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowalczyk-v-krum-nyappdiv-1961.