Kowal v. DiNapoli

94 N.E.3d 442, 30 N.Y.3d 1124, 70 N.Y.S.3d 879
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedFebruary 13, 2018
DocketNo. 55 SSM 1
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 94 N.E.3d 442 (Kowal v. DiNapoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kowal v. DiNapoli, 94 N.E.3d 442, 30 N.Y.3d 1124, 70 N.Y.S.3d 879 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:

***1124The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Substantial evidence supports the determination ***1125denying petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits. Respondent rationally determined that petitioner failed to establish that his injuries were caused by a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed (see Matter of Kelly v. DiNapoli, 30 N.Y.3d 674, 685, 70 N.Y.S.3d 881, 94 N.E.3d 444, 2018 WL 828098 [decided today]; Matter of McCambridge v. McGuire, 62 N.Y.2d 563, 568, 479 N.Y.S.2d 171, 468 N.E.2d 9 [1984] ; Matter of Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., 57 N.Y.2d 1010, 1012, 457 N.Y.S.2d 472, 443 N.E.2d 946 [1982] ).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Rawlins v. Teachers' Retirement Sys. of the City of N.Y.
42 N.Y.3d 315 (New York Court of Appeals, 2024)
Matter of Sammon v. DiNapoli
216 A.D.3d 1335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Van Wyen v. New York State Comptroller
189 N.Y.S.3d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Bodenmiller v. DiNapoli
2023 NY Slip Op 01930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Rizzo v. DiNapoli
162 N.Y.S.3d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Traverso v. DiNapoli
2021 NY Slip Op 04075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Harris v. New York State & Local Retirement Sys.
2021 NY Slip Op 00610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Lewis v. New York State Comptroller
2019 NY Slip Op 7828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Creegan v. DiNapoli
2019 NY Slip Op 4253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Sestito v. DiNapoli
2018 NY Slip Op 3886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 N.E.3d 442, 30 N.Y.3d 1124, 70 N.Y.S.3d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowal-v-dinapoli-nycterr-2018.