Kowal v. DiNapoli
This text of 94 N.E.3d 442 (Kowal v. DiNapoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM:
***1124The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Substantial evidence supports the determination ***1125denying petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits. Respondent rationally determined that petitioner failed to establish that his injuries were caused by a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed (see Matter of Kelly v. DiNapoli,
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11 ), judgment affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.E.3d 442, 30 N.Y.3d 1124, 70 N.Y.S.3d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowal-v-dinapoli-nycterr-2018.