Kovalchuck v. Simpson & Brown

189 A. 89, 117 N.J.L. 400, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 176
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 22, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 A. 89 (Kovalchuck v. Simpson & Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kovalchuck v. Simpson & Brown, 189 A. 89, 117 N.J.L. 400, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 176 (N.J. 1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation act. The question at issue is whether the death of the employe was the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The bureau, the Court of Common Pleas and the Supreme Court resolved this question in favor of the employer. We find it unnecessary to review the evidence. Suffice it to say, that where, as here, the testimony is susceptible of conflicting inferences, the findings of fact by the Supreme Court are conclusive on appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cancello v. Federal Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.
61 A.2d 46 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 A. 89, 117 N.J.L. 400, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kovalchuck-v-simpson-brown-nj-1937.