Kovac v. Borsher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kovac v. Borsher

71 A.D.2d 913, 419 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 20, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 913 (Kovac v. Borsher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kovac v. Borsher, 71 A.D.2d 913, 419 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendants Harry and Ruth Borsher from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 17, 1978, which denied their motion for a protective order vacating plaintiff’s notice to appear for an examination before trial with certain books and records. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term directed that the examination before trial be held at the "Supreme Court Building Mineóla”, and further directed that appellants produce "all the records, documents and material in their possession relative to the commercial dealings between the parties.” Special Term thus insured adequate supervision over the discovery proceedings so as to prevent the "fishing expedition” about which appellants complain in their brief. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendants Harry and Ruth Borsher from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 17, 1978, which denied their motion for a protective order vacating plaintiff’s notice to appear for an examination before trial with certain books and records. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term directed that the examination before trial be held at the "Supreme Court Building Mineóla”, and further directed that appellants produce "all the records, documents and material in their possession relative to the commercial dealings between the parties.” Special Term thus insured adequate supervision over the discovery proceedings so as to prevent the "fishing expedition” about which appellants complain in their brief. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 913, 419 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kovac-v-borsher-nyappdiv-1979.