Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Koutsoupakis v. City of New York

Koutsoupakis v. City of New York

292 A.D.2d 191, 738 N.Y.S.2d 211, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2364
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered August 3, 2001, which, inter alia, denied third-party defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3404, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As a note of issue has yet to be filed, the complaint cannot be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 (Johnson v Minskoff & Sons, 287 AD2d 233, citing Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190, lv dismissed 96 NY2d 937; see also, Jiles v New York City Tr. Auth., 290 AD2d 307). We have considered and rejected appellant’s argument that the above authorities erroneously interpret CPLR 3404. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koutsoupakis v. City of New York, 292 A.D.2d 191, 738 N.Y.S.2d 211, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

292 A.D.2d 191 (Koutsoupakis v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jarrett v. City of New York
301 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Pearl v. City of New York
293 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)