Koussevitzky v. Allen, Towne & Heath, Inc.

272 A.D.2d 759

This text of 272 A.D.2d 759 (Koussevitzky v. Allen, Towne & Heath, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koussevitzky v. Allen, Towne & Heath, Inc., 272 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order denying a temporary injunction should be affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents.

Our affirmance of the order should not be construed as a determination by this court that injunctive relief may not be had to restrain the publication of defamatory statements in a proper case. Suffice it to say that the record before us does not furnish any proper basis for the granting of a temporary injunction.

Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. [188 Misc. 479.] [See post, p. 794.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koussevitzky v. Allen, Towne & Heath, Inc.
188 Misc. 479 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koussevitzky-v-allen-towne-heath-inc-nyappdiv-1947.