Kourouma v. Holder

444 F. App'x 638
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kourouma v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 588 F.3d 234
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2011·No. No. 11-1108·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mory Kourouma, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Kourouma’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kourouma (B.I.A. Jan. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kourouma v. Holder, 444 F. App'x 638 (4th Cir. 2011).

444 F. App'x 638 (Kourouma v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related