Kountze v. Proprietors of the Morris Aqueduct
34 A. 1099, 58 N.J.L. 695, 29 Vroom 695, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 61
This text of 34 A. 1099 (Kountze v. Proprietors of the Morris Aqueduct) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kountze v. Proprietors of the Morris Aqueduct, 34 A. 1099, 58 N.J.L. 695, 29 Vroom 695, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 61 (N.J. 1896).
Opinion
The legal questions involved in this ease were, we think, rightly dealt with in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The matters of fact decided in that court are not subject to review in the Court of Errors.
The judgment below must be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief • Justice, Depue, Dixon, Gummere, Ludlow, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon. 9.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Szymczak v. LaFerrara
655 A.2d 76 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
In re Probate of the Last Will & Testament of McCall
398 A.2d 1210 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1978)
In THE MATTER OF McCALL
398 A.2d 1210 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1978)
Adams v. Greenwich Water Co.
83 A.2d 177 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1951)
Smith v. Anderson
214 P.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1950)
Conduit Found. Corp. v. City of Atlantic City
64 A.2d 382 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Moro v. Pulone
52 A.2d 818 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Alexander v. Manza
36 A.2d 142 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Fid. Union Trust v. Prudent Invest.
19 A.2d 224 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Mann v. Bugbee
167 A. 202 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Walser v. Farmers Trust Co.
185 N.E. 535 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)
Brogan v. Ferguson
131 So. 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Olson v. Shephard
206 N.W. 711 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)
Adams v. Iowa Gas & Electric Co.
203 N.W. 229 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1925)
Kinyon Investment Co. v. Belmont State Bank
221 P. 286 (Montana Supreme Court, 1923)
Pathé Exchange, Inc. v. Miller
278 F. 997 (D.C. Circuit, 1922)
Kearns-Gorsuch Bottle Co. v. Hartford-Fairmont Co.
1 F.2d 318 (S.D. New York, 1921)
New Haven Water Co. v. Russell
85 A. 636 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1912)
Hope v. Bourland
1908 OK 165 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Price v. Stratton
45 Fla. 535 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 A. 1099, 58 N.J.L. 695, 29 Vroom 695, 1896 N.J. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kountze-v-proprietors-of-the-morris-aqueduct-nj-1896.