Koumjian v. Perry

325 F. App'x 317
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 2009
Docket08-50599
StatusUnpublished

This text of 325 F. App'x 317 (Koumjian v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koumjian v. Perry, 325 F. App'x 317 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Paul James Koumjian, Texas prisoner # 1039181, seeks a certificate of appeala-bility (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as an unauthorized successive § 2254 petition. The district court’s ruling relied upon its time-bar dismissal of Koumjian’s prior federal habeas petition filed in 2005. The appeal from that dismissal, however, remains pending in this court. See Koum-jian v. Quarterman, No. 06-51492. Accordingly, Koumjian has shown “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Woollard v. United States, 416 F.2d 50, 51 (5th Cir.1968). Koumjian’s motion for a COA is GRANTED, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this ruling. Koumjian’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Donald G. Woollard v. United States
416 F.2d 50 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 F. App'x 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koumjian-v-perry-ca5-2009.