Kotzker v. Bonafilia

290 A.D.2d 556, 736 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 801
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kotzker v. Bonafilia. Read the opinion of the Court — 284 A.D.2d 535

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), dated July 19, 1999, which, upon finding that the appellant violated two orders of protection of the same court dated June 24, 1999 (Garvey, J.), and July 2, 1999 (Warren, J.), respectively, committed him to the Rockland County Jail for a period of 210 days.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[557]*557Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the performance of his assigned counsel amply met the standard of meaningful representation (see, People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563; People v Blaylock, 266 AD2d 400).

Moreover, in light of the order of the Family Court, Rockland County, dated September 15, 1999, releasing the appellant from jail, any issue concerning the length of his sentence is academic. Florio, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kotzker v. Bonafilia, 290 A.D.2d 556, 736 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

290 A.D.2d 556 (Kotzker v. Bonafilia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Henry
744 N.E.2d 112 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Blaylock
266 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)