Kotzias v. Panagiotis

91 A.D.3d 607, 936 N.Y.2d 555
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 10, 2012·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In support of his motion for summary judgment, the defendant made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting evidence that he approached and entered the intersection with the right-of-way, and that the plaintiff violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 (a) by failing to yield the right-of-way, which constituted negligence as a matter of law (see Thompson v Schmitt, 74 AD3d 789 [2010]; McCain v Larosa, 41 AD3d 792, 793 [2007]; Gergis v Miccio, 39 AD3d 468 [2007]), and resulted in the subject accident. Inasmuch as the defendant had the right-of-way, he was entitled to anticipate that the plaintiff would obey traffic laws which required the plaintiff to yield (see Yelder v Walters, 64 AD3d 762, 764 [2009]; Thompson v Schmitt, 74 AD3d at 790; Klein v Crespo, 50 AD3d 745, 745-746 [2008]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Mastro, A.EJ., Balkin, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kotzias v. Panagiotis, 91 A.D.3d 607, 936 N.Y.2d 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

91 A.D.3d 607 (Kotzias v. Panagiotis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Katikireddy v. Espinal
137 A.D.3d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Crowe v. Hanley
123 A.D.3d 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Joaquin v. Franco
116 A.D.3d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Harris v. Linares
106 A.D.3d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Zuleta v. Quijada
94 A.D.3d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)