Kottenstette v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJune 24, 2019
Docket15-1016
StatusUnpublished

This text of Kottenstette v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Kottenstette v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kottenstette v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2019).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1016V Filed: May 29, 2019 Not to be Published

************************************* MARYELLEN KOTTENSTETTE and * NICHOLAS KOTTENSTETTE, * as best friends of their daughter (CK) * Damages decision based on proffer * Petitioners, * * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* John F. McHugh, New York, NY, for petitioner. Camille Collett, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On September 11, 2015, petitioners filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2012), alleging that diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (“DTaP”), haemophilus B influenza (“HiB”), inactivated polio vaccine (“IPV”), and pneumococcal (“Prevnar”) vaccines administered to their daughter CK on October 2, 2012,

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. caused her a Table encephalopathy or, in the alternative, a non-Table encephalopathy, and infantile spasms. On December 12, 2017, the undersigned ruled for petitioners on entitlement.

On May 29, 2019, respondent filed Respondent’s Proffer on Award of Compensation. The undersigned finds the terms of the proffer to be reasonable. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to the award as stated in the proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached proffer, the undersigned awards the following:

a. a lump sum payment of $1,046,521.75, representing trust seed funds consisting of the present year cost of compensation for residential facility expenses in Compensation Year 2077 through Compensation Year 2081 ($939,875.00) and life care expenses in the first year after judgment ($106,646.75), in the form of a check payable to Regions Bank, as Trustee of the Grantor Reversionary Trust established for the benefit of CK, as set forth in the attached Appendix A; b. a lump sum payment of $1,132,020.68, representing compensation for lost future earnings ($882,020.68) and pain and suffering ($250,000.00), in the form of a check payable to petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of CK, for the benefit of CK, in accordance with the terms set out in the attached proffer; c. a lump sum payment of $12,698.57, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners, Maryellen Kottenstette and Nicholas Kottenstette; d. a lump sum payment of $15,528.38, representing compensation for satisfaction of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioners and Commonwealth of Massachusetts – CRU COMMONWEALTH OF MA Casualty Recovery P.O. Box 417811 Boston, MA 02241-7811 Attn: Alicia Villagran SSN: XXXXX9919 e. an amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in section E of the attached proffer.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 29, 2019 /s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) MARYELLEN KOTTENSTETTE and ) NICHOLAS KOTTENSTETTE as best ) friends of their daughter (CK), ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) No. 15-1016V ) Special Master Millman SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ) HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

The respondent engaged life care planner, Laura Fox, MSN, BSN, RN, CDDN, CLCP,

and petitioners engaged Bala Care Nursing Solutions, to provide an estimation of CK’s future

vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as

described in the Special Master’s Ruling on Entitlement, filed December 12, 2017. All items of

compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by

the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for CK, attached hereto as Tab A. 1

1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.

-1- Respondent proffers that CK should be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the life

care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. 2 Petitioners agree.

B. Lost Future Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, CK will not be gainfully

employed in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers that CK should be awarded lost future

earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B). Respondent

proffers that the appropriate award for CK's lost future earnings is $882,020.68. Petitioners

agree.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that CK should be awarded $250,000.00 in actual pain and suffering.

See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioners agree.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioners document their expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to CK's vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioners should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $12,698.57. Petitioners agree.

E. Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that CK should be awarded funds to satisfy a Commonwealth of

Massachusetts lien in the amount of $15,528.38, which represents full satisfaction of any right of

subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

2 The parties have no objection to the proffered award of damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(f)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kottenstette v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kottenstette-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2019.