Kotsampas v. United States
This text of 257 F.2d 64 (Kotsampas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These consolidated appeals were taken from judgments of conviction for violation of 8 U.S.C.A. § 1282(c). The appellants, alien crewmen, were found to have wilfully remained in the United States in excess of the time permitted by conditional landing permits which had been issued to them. The only substantial question raised by these appeals was whether the offense charged was continuous so as to permit prosecution in the Southern District of Ohio, where defendants were apprehended, or whether the offense was complete when the landing permits expired. This question has now been decided adversely to appellants’ contention by the Supreme Court. United States v. Cores, 356 U.S. 405, 78 S.Ct. 875, 2 L.Ed.2d 873.
Accordingly the judgments of conviction must be and hereby are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 F.2d 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kotsampas-v-united-states-ca6-1958.