Kotkis v. State

505 So. 2d 29, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1987·No. Nos. 87-0438, 87-0473 and 87-0513·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the two applications for certio-rari and affirm all of the trial court orders being reviewed in these consolidated proceedings. Cf Rollins Burdick Hunter of New York, Inc. v. Euroclassics Limited, Inc., 502 So.2d 959 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Walton v. Turlington, 444 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Ulinsky v. Avignone, 148 [30]*30N.J.Super. 250, 372 A.2d 620 (App.Div.1977).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kotkis v. State, 505 So. 2d 29, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

505 So. 2d 29 (Kotkis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. Turlington
444 So. 2d 1082 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Ulinsky v. Avignone
372 A.2d 620 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Rollins Burdick Hunter v. Euroclassics Ltd.
502 So. 2d 959 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)