Kotha v. Dist. Ct. (Mantena)

Nevada Supreme Court

Kotha v. Dist. Ct. (Mantena)

DecidedJanuary 14, 2016

Docket69303

StatusUnpublished

This text of Kotha v. Dist. Ct. (Mantena) (Kotha v. Dist. Ct. (Mantena)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kotha v. Dist. Ct. (Mantena), (Neb. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SURYA KOTHA, No. 69303 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE WILLIAM D. KEPHART, DISTRICT JUDGE, FILE Respondents, JAN I 4 2016 and TRACIE K. UNDEIVAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT RAVI MANTENA; RAJU MANTENA; ey MNR EDUCATIONAL TRUST; OEPU CLERK

DWIBASHYAM MEHAR SUBRAHMANYAM; V.S. RAJU; AND CHANDRASEKHARAM SEKHAR TATAPUDY, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order granting a motion for a continuance and a stay. Having considered the arguments raised in the petition, we are not persuaded that the district court arbitrarily or capriciously abused its discretion in granting the motion so as to warrant our extraordinary and discretionary intervention. NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004);

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

(0) 1947A e> -0 l2S S Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

/ frea,s; , J. Hardesty

-26titeth- Saitta , J.

Pickering Pitlett

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Muckleroy Lunt, LLC Sabharwal & Finkel LLC Marquis Aurbach Coffing Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) L947A em,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SURYA KOTHA, No. 69303 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE WILLIAM D. KEPHART, DISTRICT JUDGE, FILE Respondents, JAN I 4 2016 and TRACIE K. UNDEIVAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT RAVI MANTENA; RAJU MANTENA; ey MNR EDUCATIONAL TRUST; OEPU CLERK

DWIBASHYAM MEHAR SUBRAHMANYAM; V.S. RAJU; AND CHANDRASEKHARAM SEKHAR TATAPUDY, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order granting a motion for a continuance and a stay. Having considered the arguments raised in the petition, we are not persuaded that the district court arbitrarily or capriciously abused its discretion in granting the motion so as to warrant our extraordinary and discretionary intervention. NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004);

SUPREME COURT Of NEVADA

(0) 1947A e> -0 l2S S Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

/ frea,s; , J. Hardesty

-26titeth- Saitta , J.

Pickering Pitlett

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Muckleroy Lunt, LLC Sabharwal & Finkel LLC Marquis Aurbach Coffing Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) L947A em,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kotha v. Dist. Ct. (Mantena), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kotha-v-dist-ct-mantena-nev-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack