Kostyshyn v. The City of Wilmington
This text of Kostyshyn v. The City of Wilmington (Kostyshyn v. The City of Wilmington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
PETER KOSTYSHYN, § § No. 359, 2021 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. N18J-02078 THE CITY OF WILMINGTON, a § municipal corporation of the State of § Delaware, § § Plaintiff Below, Appellee. §
Submitted: December 15, 2021 Decided: December 15, 2021
ORDER
The appellant, Peter Kostyshyn, filed a notice of appeal from a November 8,
2021, decision of the Superior Court denying a motion for a stay of a sheriff sale.
On November 12, 2021, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice directing Kostyshyn
to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with
Supreme Court Rule 42 in taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. Postal
records indicate that the notice to show cause was delivered on December 4, 2021.
A timely response to the notice to show cause was due by December 14, 2021. The
appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required
ten-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kostyshyn v. The City of Wilmington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kostyshyn-v-the-city-of-wilmington-del-2021.