Kostyshyn v. State

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedJanuary 23, 2019
Docket617, 2018
StatusPublished

This text of Kostyshyn v. State (Kostyshyn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kostyshyn v. State, (Del. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PETER KOSTYSHYN, § § No. 617, 2018 Defendant, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 0908020496 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Plaintiff, § Appellee. §

Submitted: January 11, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

ORDER

On December 20, 2018, the appellant, Peter Kostyshyn, filed a notice of

appeal from a Superior Court order, dated December 4, 2018, requiring him to

receive restoration of competency treatment at Delaware Psychiatric Center for a

contested violation of probation hearing and an amended Superior Court order, dated

December 10, 2018, requiring him to undergo an evaluation at the Department of

Correction to determine whether his competency can be restored, a report to be filed

within 30 days, and the State to notify the Superior Court of the maximum expiration

date of Kostyshyn’s sentences. On December 21, 2018, the Senior Court Clerk

issued a notice directing Kostyshyn to show why this appeal should not be dismissed

based on: (i) this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear a criminal interlocutory appeal;

(ii) his representation by counsel in the Superior Court proceedings; and (iii) his failure to comply with this Court’s July 16, 2013 order requiring him to include the

filing fee or a properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with pro se

filings relating to his criminal cases. Kostyshyn did not respond to the notice to

show cause within the required the ten-day period, making dismissal deemed to be

unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(c), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kostyshyn v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kostyshyn-v-state-del-2019.