Kostyrka v. Vitelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kostyrka v. Vitelli

47 A.D.2d 763, 366 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9059

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 763 (Kostyrka v. Vitelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kostyrka v. Vitelli, 47 A.D.2d 763, 366 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding inter alia to invalidate petitions nominating respondents Becker, Buzzeo, Arndt and Leeds as candidates of the Lynbrook Independent Party, Inc., in the village election to be held on March 18, 1975 for certain public offices in the Village of Lynbrook, (1) petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 12, 1975, as denied all the relief sought except those of (a) declaring valid the nominating petition of the Home Life independent body and (b) directing that appellant’s name as a candidate for mayor be placed on the ballot on the first line or row not previously assigned to any other candidate; and (2) respondent Vitelli (election officer of the village) cross-appeals from the remainder of [764]*764the judgment, i.e., so much thereof as reinstated the petition nominating appellant as such candidate. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding inter alia to invalidate petitions nominating respondents Becker, Buzzeo, Arndt and Leeds as candidates of the Lynbrook Independent Party, Inc., in the village election to be held on March 18, 1975 for certain public offices in the Village of Lynbrook, (1) petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 12, 1975, as denied all the relief sought except those of (a) declaring valid the nominating petition of the Home Life independent body and (b) directing that appellant’s name as a candidate for mayor be placed on the ballot on the first line or row not previously assigned to any other candidate; and (2) respondent Vitelli (election officer of the village) cross-appeals from the remainder of [764]*764the judgment, i.e., so much thereof as reinstated the petition nominating appellant as such candidate. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 763, 366 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kostyrka-v-vitelli-nyappdiv-1975.